Create a free Diverse: Issues In Higher Education account to continue reading

Univ. of Texas Professor Criticized Over Comments About Pandemic

Univ. of Texas Professor Criticized Over Comments About Pandemic


      A University of Texas biology professor has been targeted by talk radio, bloggers and vitriolic e-mails — including a death threat — after a newspaper article suggested that he advocated death for most of the population as a means of saving the Earth.

      But Dr. Eric Pianka says his remarks about what he believes is an impending pandemic were taken out of context.

      “What we really need to do is start thinking about controlling our population before it’s too late,” he says. “It’s already too late, but we’re not even thinking about it. We’re just mindlessly rushing ahead breeding our brains out.”

      The public furor began when The Gazette-Enterprise of Seguin, Texas, reported Sunday on two speeches Pianka made last month to groups of scientists and students about vanishing animal habitats and the explosion of the human population.

      The newspaper’s Jamie Mobley attended one of those speeches and also interviewed Forrest Mims, an amateur scientist and author who heard Pianka speak early last month before the Texas Academy of Science. The article was widely circulated and quickly became talk radio fodder.

      The Gazette-Enterprise quoted Pianka as saying disease “will control the scourge of humanity. We’re looking forward to a huge collapse.” According to the article, Pianka weighed the killing power of various diseases such as bird flu and HIV, insisting neither would yield the needed results.

      “HIV is too slow. It’s no good,” he is reported to have said. He went on to discuss how an ebola pandemic could wipe out a significant chunk of the human population.

      Pianka says he was only trying to warn his audience that disease epidemics have happened before and will happen again if the human population growth isn’t contained. He says he believes the Earth would be better off if the human population were smaller because fewer natural resources would be consumed and humans wouldn’t continue to destroy animal habitats. But he says that doesn’t mean he wants most humans to die.

      But Mims, chairman of the academy’s environmental science section, told The Associated Press there was no mistaking Pianka’s disdain for humans and his desire for their elimination.

      “He wishes for it. He hopes for it. He laughs about it. He jokes about it,” Mims said. “It’s got to happen because we are the scourge of humanity.”

      University of Texas officials don’t plan to take any action against Pianka, university spokesman Don Hale says.

      “Dr. Pianka has First Amendment rights to express his point of view,” Hale says. “We have plenty of faculty with a lot of different points of view and they have the right to express that point of view, but they’re expressing their personal point of view.”

— Associated Press

© Copyright 2005 by

A New Track: Fostering Diversity and Equity in Athletics
American sport has always served as a platform for resistance and has been measured and critiqued by how it responds in critical moments of racial and social crises.
Read More
A New Track: Fostering Diversity and Equity in Athletics